Contents
- What DORA is
- Who it applies to and what testing you need
- The testing programme: what Art. 24 and 25 require
- TLPT: threat-led penetration testing
- How a TLPT runs, with deadlines
- Who may carry out the test
- Reporting major incidents
- ICT providers: what goes into the contract
- Moldova: the NBM ICT Regulation
- Romania: the BNR coordinates TLPT
- Practical steps
- Frequently asked questions
- Sources
In 30 seconds
- DORA, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, has applied directly since 17 January 2025, without national transposition 1.
- All financial entities except microenterprises keep a testing programme and test at least yearly the systems supporting critical or important functions (Art. 24) 1.
- TLPT is carried out at least every 3 years, only by entities identified by the authority, on live production systems (Art. 26) 1.
- RTS 2025/1190 sets the process: a red-team phase of at least 12 weeks, mandatory purple teaming, reports with deadlines 2.
- In Moldova, the NBM ICT Regulation requires pentests on critical systems at least every 3 years, by certified testers 9.
- Applies from
- 17 Jan 2025 1
- Baseline testing
- at least yearly 1
- TLPT
- every 3 years 1
- Red-team phase
- ≥ 12 weeks 2
What DORA is
DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) is Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector. It was adopted on 14 December 2022, published in the Official Journal on 27 December 2022 and has applied since 17 January 2025 (Art. 64) 1. Being a regulation, not a directive, it applies directly in every member state.
| Chapter | What it governs |
|---|---|
| II (Art. 5–16) | ICT risk management |
| III (Art. 17–23) | Incident management, classification and reporting |
| IV (Art. 24–27) | Digital operational resilience testing, including TLPT |
| V (Art. 28–44) | ICT third-party risk |
| VI (Art. 45) | Information sharing on threats |
Who it applies to and what testing you need
Art. 2(1) lists 20 types of financial entities: credit institutions, payment and e-money institutions, account information service providers, investment firms, crypto-asset service providers, central securities depositories, central counterparties, trading venues, fund managers, insurers and reinsurers, insurance intermediaries, occupational pension funds, rating agencies, crowdfunding platforms and others. Point (u) adds ICT third-party service providers 1.
Excluded are, among others, insurers below the Solvency II thresholds, insurance intermediaries that are micro, small or medium-sized enterprises and pension funds with no more than 15 members (Art. 2(3)). Small and non-interconnected investment firms, exempted payment and e-money institutions and small pension funds apply a simplified framework (Art. 16), detailed in Delegated Regulation 2024/1774 13.
What testing does DORA require of you? Check in 30 seconds
Indicative, based on DORA Art. 2, 16, 24–26 and 30, RTS 2025/1190 and the NBM ICT Regulation. Classification is decided by the authority; this is not legal advice.
Annual testing and TLPT at least every 3 years
On top of the annual programme (Art. 24–25), entities identified by the authority carry out TLPT on live production systems, under RTS 2025/1190: at least three threat-intelligence scenarios, a red-team phase of at least 12 weeks, mandatory purple teaming at the end.
- Initiation documents within 3 months of notification, the scope document within 6 months.
- Threat-intelligence providers and testers are selected against Art. 27 and the RTS (references, experience, insurance).
- Between two TLPTs, the annual tests on critical functions remain mandatory.
Annual programme for certain; TLPT only if the authority identifies you
TLPT is not done on your own initiative: the competent authority requires it, based on the impact and risk criteria in the RTS. Above the default thresholds you are in principle required, unless the assessment justifies an exception.
- Check the thresholds in Art. 2(2) of the RTS for your type of entity.
- Meanwhile, make sure the annual tests cover every system supporting critical or important functions.
A testing programme, with annual tests on critical functions
Art. 24 requires a risk-based testing programme, with tests carried out by independent parties, internal or external, and at least yearly appropriate tests on all ICT systems and applications supporting critical or important functions. Penetration testing is one of the tests listed in Art. 25.
- Inventory the critical or important functions and the systems behind them.
- Prioritise the findings and validate that they are closed (Art. 24(5)).
The simplified framework of Art. 16, without TLPT
Art. 5–15 do not apply to you; you keep a documented simplified framework with continuous monitoring, continuity and periodic testing of plans and controls. The details are in Delegated Regulation 2024/1774. TLPT cannot be required of you.
- Periodic testing must be documented: what was tested, when and with what result.
Proportionate testing, without TLPT
Microenterprises combine the risk-based approach with strategic planning of the tests (Art. 25(3)) and are excluded from TLPT (Art. 26(1)).
- Focus the tests on internet-facing systems and those handling payments or customer data.
In Moldova: pentests on critical systems at least every 3 years
DORA does not apply directly, but the NBM ICT Regulation (Decision No. 29/2025) requires risk-proportionate scans and penetration tests, and on critical systems tests on an ongoing basis and at least every 3 years, by testers with international certifications.
- Test results and the latest scans go into the annual report to the NBM, in the first month of the year.
- Also test at major changes, after major incidents and when launching new systems.
Financial clients will require access, audits and TLPT participation from you
The financial entity remains fully responsible (Art. 28). For critical or important functions, the contract must require you to participate and cooperate fully in TLPT and to grant unrestricted rights of access, inspection and audit (Art. 30(3)).
- A recent pentest report on the service you deliver is the evidence clients usually ask for at contracting.
DORA does not seem to apply to you
DORA concerns the financial entities in Art. 2 and, through contracts, their ICT providers. For other organisations the requirements come from NIS2 or national law.
- See the NIS2 and Law 48/2023 guides below.
The testing programme: what Art. 24 and 25 require
- A testing programme as part of the ICT risk management framework, for all entities except microenterprises (Art. 24(1)) 1.
- A risk-based approach: what is tested and how much follows from the risk assessment (Art. 24(3)) 1.
- Tests are carried out by independent parties, internal or external; an internal tester requires sufficient resources and avoidance of conflicts of interest (Art. 24(4)) 1.
- Procedures to prioritise and remediate, with validation that findings are closed (Art. 24(5)) 1.
- At least yearly, appropriate tests on all ICT systems and applications supporting critical or important functions (Art. 24(6)) 1.
Art. 25(1) lists the possible tests: vulnerability assessments and scans, open source analyses, network security assessments, gap analyses, physical security reviews, questionnaires and scanning software solutions, source code reviews where feasible, scenario-based tests, compatibility testing, performance testing, end-to-end testing and penetration testing 1. Central securities depositories and central counterparties perform vulnerability assessments before any deployment (Art. 25(2)).
| Criterion | Baseline testing (Art. 24–25) | TLPT (Art. 26–27) |
|---|---|---|
| Who | All entities except microenterprises 1 | Only entities identified by the authority 1 |
| How often | At least yearly, on critical functions 1 | At least every 3 years; the authority may change the frequency 1 |
| On what | Systems and applications supporting critical or important functions | Several or all critical functions, on live production 1 |
| Who tests | Independent parties, internal or external 1 | Testers meeting Art. 27; external at every third test 1 |
| Outcome | Prioritised findings and validated remediation 1 | Attestation issued by the authority 1 |
TLPT: threat-led penetration testing
TLPT (threat-led penetration testing) reproduces the tactics of real attackers, based on threat intelligence, on the entity’s live production systems. The entity sets the scope and the authority validates it; ICT providers in scope must take part, and the test can be pooled with other entities (Art. 26(2)–(4)) 1.
The details are in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1190, adopted on 13 February 2025, published on 18 June 2025 and in force from the 20th day after publication. Recital (1) states that the standard mirrors the TIBER-EU framework 2.
| Required by default (RTS, Art. 2(2)) | Threshold |
|---|---|
| Credit institutions | G-SIIs or O-SIIs, or part of one 2 |
| Payment institutions | Over EUR 150 bn in transactions in each of the last 2 years 2 |
| E-money institutions | Over EUR 150 bn in transactions or over EUR 40 bn of e-money outstanding 2 |
| CSDs and CCPs | All 2 |
| Trading venues | The largest national share or over 5% of the EU share 2 |
| Insurers and reinsurers | The largest, by gross written premiums, technical provisions and market share 2 |
The thresholds apply unless the authority’s assessment justifies an exception; otherwise the authority decides on impact and ICT risk criteria (Art. 2(1) of the RTS) 2. The authority has a TLPT cyber team and appoints a test manager for each test, while the entity appoints a control team lead; the test is confidential and runs under a code name (Art. 3–4) 2.
How a TLPT runs, with deadlines
- ≤ 3 monthsInitiation
Initiation documents, from the authority’s notification (RTS, Art. 9) 2.
- ≤ 6 monthsScope
The scope document, approved by the entity’s management body (Art. 9) 2.
- ≥ 3Threat scenarios
At least 3 scenarios, of which at most one not threat-led (Art. 10) 2.
- ≥ 12 weeksActive red-team phase
The attack itself, with at least weekly reporting to the control team (Art. 11) 2.
- ≤ 4 weeksRed-team report
From the end of the active phase (Art. 12) 2.
- ≤ 10 weeksBlue team, replay, purple teaming
The defenders’ report, the attack replay and purple teaming, which is mandatory (Art. 12) 2.
- ≤ 8 weeks
Who may carry out the test
Art. 27(1) requires TLPT testers to 1:
- be of the highest suitability and reputability;
- have technical and organisational capabilities, with expertise in threat intelligence, penetration testing and red teaming;
- be certified by an accreditation body in a member state or adhere to codes of conduct or ethical frameworks;
- provide independent assurance or an audit report on the management of TLPT risks;
- professional indemnity insurance, including against misconduct and negligence.
The RTS adds concrete selection thresholds (Art. 7): the threat-intelligence provider presents at least 3 references, with a manager of at least 5 years’ experience and another member of at least 2 years; external testers present at least 5 references, with a manager of at least 5 years and at least two testers with 2 years each of experience in pentesting and red teaming 2. Internal testers need the authority’s approval and an external threat-intelligence provider; every third test uses external testers, and significant banks supervised by the ECB use external testers only 12.
Reporting major incidents
Art. 19 requires an initial notification, an intermediate report and a final report to the competent authority; clients are informed without undue delay when their financial interests are affected 1. The classification of major incidents is in Delegated Regulation 2024/1772 and the deadlines in Art. 5 of Delegated Regulation 2025/301 45:
- 4 h / 24 hInitial notification
Within 4 hours of classification as a major incident and within 24 hours of the entity becoming aware of it 4.
- 72 hIntermediate report
Within 72 hours of the initial notification, even if nothing has changed 4.
- 1 monthFinal report
Within one month of the last intermediate report 4.
ICT providers: what goes into the contract
The financial entity remains fully responsible for outsourced services and keeps a register of information on all ICT contracts (Art. 28), using the templates in Implementing Regulation 2024/2956 16. For critical or important functions, Art. 30(3) requires the contract to include 1:
- the provider’s obligation to participate and fully cooperate in TLPT (point (d));
- unrestricted rights of access, inspection and audit for the entity, a designated third party and the authority (point (e));
- exit strategies (point (f)).
Moldova: the NBM ICT Regulation
In Moldova, DORA does not apply directly. The practical equivalent is the NBM Regulation on minimum requirements for managing ICT, information security and business continuity risks, approved by Decision No. 29 of 12 February 2025, in force since 20 March 2025, with compliance periods of 3, 9, 12 and 15 months 9. It applies to banks and branches of foreign banks, payment companies, e-money issuing companies and postal service providers (Art. 5(1)(a)–(d) of Law 114/2012); its explanatory note declares it aligned with the EBA ICT risk guidelines and DORA.
| Item | What it requires |
|---|---|
| item 33.1 | Vulnerability scans and penetration tests proportionate to risk 9 |
| item 33.2 | On critical systems: on an ongoing basis and at least every 3 years, or more often at the NBM’s request 9 |
| item 33.3 | Following validated scenarios, on live production 9 |
| item 33.4 | Testers with international certifications, e.g. OSCP, CEH, GPEN, CPENT, OPST, LPT 9 |
| item 33.5 | Testing at major changes, after major incidents and when launching new systems 9 |
| item 82 | Within the first month after year-end: pentest results, the latest scans (December), the SWIFT CSCF assessment and the PCI DSS report where applicable 9 |
Romania: the BNR coordinates TLPT
In Romania, Emergency Ordinance No. 14 of 5 March 2026, published in Official Gazette No. 188 of 11 March 2026, splits DORA supervision: the BNR (National Bank of Romania) for credit, payment and e-money institutions and account information service providers, and the ASF (Financial Supervisory Authority) for investment firms, insurers, intermediaries and pension funds 10. The BNR is the single public authority coordinating TLPT (Art. 5(2)); the ASF decides which of its entities carry out TLPT, the summary and remediation go to the BNR, which issues the attestation, and ASF entities forward it to the ASF within 30 days (Art. 5(3), Art. 11) 10. Romania is listed among the countries that have adopted TIBER-EU 11.
Practical steps
- Establish your regime
Full, simplified (Art. 16) or microenterprise; in Moldova, whether the NBM ICT Regulation covers you.
- Inventory critical functions
And the systems, applications and ICT providers behind them; the register of information starts here.
- Write the testing programme
Which Art. 25 tests, on which systems, how often and by whom, with independence documented.
- Test and remediate
Findings are prioritised and their closure validated by a retest (Art. 24(5)).
- Prepare for TLPT
If you are close to the thresholds: the control team, providers, the TLPT clauses in ICT contracts.
Frequently asked questions
What is DORA and when does it apply?
Must every financial entity carry out TLPT?
How long does a TLPT take?
Does a TIBER-EU test count as a DORA TLPT?
How quickly must a major incident be reported?
Does DORA apply to banks in Moldova?
Sources
Every statement about a law or standard links to its official source. Consulted on the date shown.
- Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector (DORA)eur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
- Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1190: regulatory technical standards on TLPTeur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
- Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774: ICT risk management framework, including the simplified oneeur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
- Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/301: content and time limits of incident reportseur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
- Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772: classification of major ICT-related incidentseur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
- Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2956: register of information on ICT contractseur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
- ECB: TIBER-EU updated to align with the TLPT RTS (11 Feb 2025)ecb.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
- TIBER-EU Framework, 2025 versionecb.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
- National Bank of Moldova: Regulation on minimum requirements for managing ICT, information security and business continuity risks (Decision No. 29/2025)bnm.md · accessed 22 October 2026
- Romania: Emergency Ordinance No. 14/2026 (Official Gazette No. 188 of 11 March 2026)infodosar.ro · accessed 22 October 2026
- ECB: the TIBER-EU programme and the countries that adopted itecb.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
About the authors
The guides are written by the team that does the testing, not a marketing department. We update them when the law, the standard or what we see in testing changes.
Informational material, not legal advice. The specific classification and identification for TLPT are made by the competent authority. Sources were consulted on the update date.