Regulatory guide · Financial sector

DORA and TLPT:
what testing you actually need

DORA has applied since 17 January 2025, and since 2025 TLPT has had its own technical regulation. Who must test, how often, who may carry out the test and what follows — article by article, with sources. Plus what the NBM requires in Moldova and the BNR in Romania.

Updated 14 min read 11 cited sources
Contents
  1. What DORA is
  2. Who it applies to and what testing you need
  3. The testing programme: what Art. 24 and 25 require
  4. TLPT: threat-led penetration testing
  5. How a TLPT runs, with deadlines
  6. Who may carry out the test
  7. Reporting major incidents
  8. ICT providers: what goes into the contract
  9. Moldova: the NBM ICT Regulation
  10. Romania: the BNR coordinates TLPT
  11. Practical steps
  12. Frequently asked questions
  13. Sources

In 30 seconds

  • DORA, Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, has applied directly since 17 January 2025, without national transposition 1.
  • All financial entities except microenterprises keep a testing programme and test at least yearly the systems supporting critical or important functions (Art. 24) 1.
  • TLPT is carried out at least every 3 years, only by entities identified by the authority, on live production systems (Art. 26) 1.
  • RTS 2025/1190 sets the process: a red-team phase of at least 12 weeks, mandatory purple teaming, reports with deadlines 2.
  • In Moldova, the NBM ICT Regulation requires pentests on critical systems at least every 3 years, by certified testers 9.
Applies from
17 Jan 2025 1
Baseline testing
at least yearly 1
TLPT
every 3 years 1
Red-team phase
≥ 12 weeks 2

What DORA is

DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) is Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector. It was adopted on 14 December 2022, published in the Official Journal on 27 December 2022 and has applied since 17 January 2025 (Art. 64) 1. Being a regulation, not a directive, it applies directly in every member state.

ChapterWhat it governs
II (Art. 5–16)ICT risk management
III (Art. 17–23)Incident management, classification and reporting
IV (Art. 24–27)Digital operational resilience testing, including TLPT
V (Art. 28–44)ICT third-party risk
VI (Art. 45)Information sharing on threats

Who it applies to and what testing you need

Art. 2(1) lists 20 types of financial entities: credit institutions, payment and e-money institutions, account information service providers, investment firms, crypto-asset service providers, central securities depositories, central counterparties, trading venues, fund managers, insurers and reinsurers, insurance intermediaries, occupational pension funds, rating agencies, crowdfunding platforms and others. Point (u) adds ICT third-party service providers 1.

Excluded are, among others, insurers below the Solvency II thresholds, insurance intermediaries that are micro, small or medium-sized enterprises and pension funds with no more than 15 members (Art. 2(3)). Small and non-interconnected investment firms, exempted payment and e-money institutions and small pension funds apply a simplified framework (Art. 16), detailed in Delegated Regulation 2024/1774 13.

What testing does DORA require of you? Check in 30 seconds

Indicative, based on DORA Art. 2, 16, 24–26 and 30, RTS 2025/1190 and the NBM ICT Regulation. Classification is decided by the authority; this is not legal advice.

1. What best describes your organisation?

The testing programme: what Art. 24 and 25 require

  • A testing programme as part of the ICT risk management framework, for all entities except microenterprises (Art. 24(1)) 1.
  • A risk-based approach: what is tested and how much follows from the risk assessment (Art. 24(3)) 1.
  • Tests are carried out by independent parties, internal or external; an internal tester requires sufficient resources and avoidance of conflicts of interest (Art. 24(4)) 1.
  • Procedures to prioritise and remediate, with validation that findings are closed (Art. 24(5)) 1.
  • At least yearly, appropriate tests on all ICT systems and applications supporting critical or important functions (Art. 24(6)) 1.

Art. 25(1) lists the possible tests: vulnerability assessments and scans, open source analyses, network security assessments, gap analyses, physical security reviews, questionnaires and scanning software solutions, source code reviews where feasible, scenario-based tests, compatibility testing, performance testing, end-to-end testing and penetration testing 1. Central securities depositories and central counterparties perform vulnerability assessments before any deployment (Art. 25(2)).

CriterionBaseline testing (Art. 24–25)TLPT (Art. 26–27)
WhoAll entities except microenterprises 1Only entities identified by the authority 1
How oftenAt least yearly, on critical functions 1At least every 3 years; the authority may change the frequency 1
On whatSystems and applications supporting critical or important functionsSeveral or all critical functions, on live production 1
Who testsIndependent parties, internal or external 1Testers meeting Art. 27; external at every third test 1
OutcomePrioritised findings and validated remediation 1Attestation issued by the authority 1

TLPT: threat-led penetration testing

TLPT (threat-led penetration testing) reproduces the tactics of real attackers, based on threat intelligence, on the entity’s live production systems. The entity sets the scope and the authority validates it; ICT providers in scope must take part, and the test can be pooled with other entities (Art. 26(2)–(4)) 1.

The details are in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1190, adopted on 13 February 2025, published on 18 June 2025 and in force from the 20th day after publication. Recital (1) states that the standard mirrors the TIBER-EU framework 2.

Required by default (RTS, Art. 2(2))Threshold
Credit institutionsG-SIIs or O-SIIs, or part of one 2
Payment institutionsOver EUR 150 bn in transactions in each of the last 2 years 2
E-money institutionsOver EUR 150 bn in transactions or over EUR 40 bn of e-money outstanding 2
CSDs and CCPsAll 2
Trading venuesThe largest national share or over 5% of the EU share 2
Insurers and reinsurersThe largest, by gross written premiums, technical provisions and market share 2

The thresholds apply unless the authority’s assessment justifies an exception; otherwise the authority decides on impact and ICT risk criteria (Art. 2(1) of the RTS) 2. The authority has a TLPT cyber team and appoints a test manager for each test, while the entity appoints a control team lead; the test is confidential and runs under a code name (Art. 3–4) 2.

How a TLPT runs, with deadlines

  1. ≤ 3 months
    Initiation

    Initiation documents, from the authority’s notification (RTS, Art. 9) 2.

  2. ≤ 6 months
    Scope

    The scope document, approved by the entity’s management body (Art. 9) 2.

  3. ≥ 3
    Threat scenarios

    At least 3 scenarios, of which at most one not threat-led (Art. 10) 2.

  4. ≥ 12 weeks
    Active red-team phase

    The attack itself, with at least weekly reporting to the control team (Art. 11) 2.

  5. ≤ 4 weeks
    Red-team report

    From the end of the active phase (Art. 12) 2.

  6. ≤ 10 weeks
    Blue team, replay, purple teaming

    The defenders’ report, the attack replay and purple teaming, which is mandatory (Art. 12) 2.

  7. ≤ 8 weeks
    Summary and remediation

    The summary report to the authority and the remediation plan; the authority then issues the attestation (RTS Art. 12–13; DORA Art. 26(6)–(7)) 12.

Who may carry out the test

Art. 27(1) requires TLPT testers to 1:

  • be of the highest suitability and reputability;
  • have technical and organisational capabilities, with expertise in threat intelligence, penetration testing and red teaming;
  • be certified by an accreditation body in a member state or adhere to codes of conduct or ethical frameworks;
  • provide independent assurance or an audit report on the management of TLPT risks;
  • professional indemnity insurance, including against misconduct and negligence.

The RTS adds concrete selection thresholds (Art. 7): the threat-intelligence provider presents at least 3 references, with a manager of at least 5 years’ experience and another member of at least 2 years; external testers present at least 5 references, with a manager of at least 5 years and at least two testers with 2 years each of experience in pentesting and red teaming 2. Internal testers need the authority’s approval and an external threat-intelligence provider; every third test uses external testers, and significant banks supervised by the ECB use external testers only 12.

Reporting major incidents

Art. 19 requires an initial notification, an intermediate report and a final report to the competent authority; clients are informed without undue delay when their financial interests are affected 1. The classification of major incidents is in Delegated Regulation 2024/1772 and the deadlines in Art. 5 of Delegated Regulation 2025/301 45:

  1. 4 h / 24 h
    Initial notification

    Within 4 hours of classification as a major incident and within 24 hours of the entity becoming aware of it 4.

  2. 72 h
    Intermediate report

    Within 72 hours of the initial notification, even if nothing has changed 4.

  3. 1 month
    Final report

    Within one month of the last intermediate report 4.

ICT providers: what goes into the contract

The financial entity remains fully responsible for outsourced services and keeps a register of information on all ICT contracts (Art. 28), using the templates in Implementing Regulation 2024/2956 16. For critical or important functions, Art. 30(3) requires the contract to include 1:

  • the provider’s obligation to participate and fully cooperate in TLPT (point (d));
  • unrestricted rights of access, inspection and audit for the entity, a designated third party and the authority (point (e));
  • exit strategies (point (f)).

Moldova: the NBM ICT Regulation

In Moldova, DORA does not apply directly. The practical equivalent is the NBM Regulation on minimum requirements for managing ICT, information security and business continuity risks, approved by Decision No. 29 of 12 February 2025, in force since 20 March 2025, with compliance periods of 3, 9, 12 and 15 months 9. It applies to banks and branches of foreign banks, payment companies, e-money issuing companies and postal service providers (Art. 5(1)(a)–(d) of Law 114/2012); its explanatory note declares it aligned with the EBA ICT risk guidelines and DORA.

ItemWhat it requires
item 33.1Vulnerability scans and penetration tests proportionate to risk 9
item 33.2On critical systems: on an ongoing basis and at least every 3 years, or more often at the NBM’s request 9
item 33.3Following validated scenarios, on live production 9
item 33.4Testers with international certifications, e.g. OSCP, CEH, GPEN, CPENT, OPST, LPT 9
item 33.5Testing at major changes, after major incidents and when launching new systems 9
item 82Within the first month after year-end: pentest results, the latest scans (December), the SWIFT CSCF assessment and the PCI DSS report where applicable 9

Romania: the BNR coordinates TLPT

In Romania, Emergency Ordinance No. 14 of 5 March 2026, published in Official Gazette No. 188 of 11 March 2026, splits DORA supervision: the BNR (National Bank of Romania) for credit, payment and e-money institutions and account information service providers, and the ASF (Financial Supervisory Authority) for investment firms, insurers, intermediaries and pension funds 10. The BNR is the single public authority coordinating TLPT (Art. 5(2)); the ASF decides which of its entities carry out TLPT, the summary and remediation go to the BNR, which issues the attestation, and ASF entities forward it to the ASF within 30 days (Art. 5(3), Art. 11) 10. Romania is listed among the countries that have adopted TIBER-EU 11.

Practical steps

  1. Establish your regime

    Full, simplified (Art. 16) or microenterprise; in Moldova, whether the NBM ICT Regulation covers you.

  2. Inventory critical functions

    And the systems, applications and ICT providers behind them; the register of information starts here.

  3. Write the testing programme

    Which Art. 25 tests, on which systems, how often and by whom, with independence documented.

  4. Test and remediate

    Findings are prioritised and their closure validated by a retest (Art. 24(5)).

  5. Prepare for TLPT

    If you are close to the thresholds: the control team, providers, the TLPT clauses in ICT contracts.

Frequently asked questions

What is DORA and when does it apply?
DORA is Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector. It has applied directly, without transposition, since 17 January 2025 1.
Must every financial entity carry out TLPT?
No. The testing programme with annual tests applies to all except microenterprises; TLPT only to entities identified by the authority, at least every 3 years. Microenterprises and entities under the simplified regime are excluded from TLPT 12.
How long does a TLPT take?
The active red-team phase alone lasts at least 12 weeks. With preparation (the scope document within up to 6 months of notification) and closure (reports and purple teaming within up to 10 weeks), the full process usually spans more than a year 2.
Does a TIBER-EU test count as a DORA TLPT?
The RTS allows TIBER-EU or a national implementation to be applied, insofar as it complies with DORA Art. 26–27. The ECB says TIBER-EU “can help”, not that it replaces it automatically 27.
How quickly must a major incident be reported?
The initial notification within 4 hours of classification as major and 24 hours of becoming aware, the intermediate report within 72 hours, the final one within a month of the last intermediate report 4.
Does DORA apply to banks in Moldova?
Not directly. Banks and other payment service providers apply the NBM ICT Regulation (Decision No. 29/2025), aligned with DORA, which requires penetration tests on critical systems at least every 3 years, by certified testers 9.

Sources

Every statement about a law or standard links to its official source. Consulted on the date shown.

  1. Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience for the financial sector (DORA)eur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
  2. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1190: regulatory technical standards on TLPTeur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
  3. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774: ICT risk management framework, including the simplified oneeur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
  4. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/301: content and time limits of incident reportseur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
  5. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772: classification of major ICT-related incidentseur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
  6. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2956: register of information on ICT contractseur-lex.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
  7. ECB: TIBER-EU updated to align with the TLPT RTS (11 Feb 2025)ecb.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
  8. TIBER-EU Framework, 2025 versionecb.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026
  9. National Bank of Moldova: Regulation on minimum requirements for managing ICT, information security and business continuity risks (Decision No. 29/2025)bnm.md · accessed 22 October 2026
  10. Romania: Emergency Ordinance No. 14/2026 (Official Gazette No. 188 of 11 March 2026)infodosar.ro · accessed 22 October 2026
  11. ECB: the TIBER-EU programme and the countries that adopted itecb.europa.eu · accessed 22 October 2026

About the authors

The guides are written by the team that does the testing, not a marketing department. We update them when the law, the standard or what we see in testing changes.

The Pentest.md teamSecurity engineers holding CEH, CISSP, CISA and CISM certifications

Informational material, not legal advice. The specific classification and identification for TLPT are made by the competent authority. Sources were consulted on the update date.

Related guides

Not sure what testing you need?

Book a call: together we establish your regime, critical functions and scope, and you get a testing plan for DORA or the NBM ICT Regulation.